Qualitative Research
What is Qualitative Research?
Qualitative research aims to understand people and associated complex phenomena, plus explore how and why individuals interpret experiences the way they do. Through a process of collecting, analysing and interpreting non-numerical data, qualitative research can be used to understand how individuals give meaning to their experience and their perception of their social reality.
Qualitative research seeks to understand diverse opinions rather than find generalisable outcomes. If quantitative research asks, “How many?”, qualitative research asks “Why?”.
Qualitative research adds a dimension to interventional studies by answering questions that cannot be addressed through the measurement of variables alone. In clinical research, a qualitative approach can help to understand the reasons why outcomes have or have not occurred. It can also help to ask the types of research questions that are important to a particular population, as well as strengthen clinical trials by enhancing user involvement.
Qualitative research aims to understand people and associated complex phenomena, plus explore how and why individuals interpret experiences the way they do. Through a process of collecting, analysing and interpreting non-numerical data, qualitative...
Qualitative research aims to understand people and associated complex phenomena, plus explore how and why individuals interpret experiences the way they do. Through a process of collecting, analysing and interpreting non-numerical data, qualitative research can be used to understand how individuals give meaning to their experience and their perception of their social reality.
Qualitative research seeks to understand diverse opinions rather than find generalisable outcomes. If quantitative research asks, “How many?”, qualitative research asks “Why?”.
Qualitative research adds a dimension to interventional studies by answering questions that cannot be addressed through the measurement of variables alone. In clinical research, a qualitative approach can help to understand the reasons why outcomes have or have not occurred. It can also help to ask the types of research questions that are important to a particular population, as well as strengthen clinical trials by enhancing user involvement.
Some common qualitative research methodologies
Methodology | Explanation |
---|---|
Ethnography | Focuses on people as members of groups or cultures and seeks to understand things from their perspectives. |
Phenomenology | Interested in the ‘lived experience’ of individuals – what it feels like to have a certain experience and how people understand their own experience. |
Grounded theory | A systematic approach that enables researchers to construct a theory (conceptual framework) to explain phenomena. The methodology is particularly useful when very little is known about a topic of enquiry, and when the phenomenon of interest contains a process or series of events that relate to one another. In its original form, grounded theory has strict rules for how to perform data collection and analysis. |
Narrative inquiry (narratology) | Focuses on telling stories as people’s way of understanding themselves and their experiences. Narrative inquiry regards the story as the natural form of meaning-making. |
Case study | Interested in different perspectives on particular social phenomena. |
Descriptive / Interpretative | Description of a phenomenon with a focus on a rich description of the Who, What, Where, and Why from those who have experience with that phenomenon. |
Mixed methods research
Mixed methods research uses both qualitative and quantitative methods to answer a research question. It is a research strategy that is gaining increased attention across disciplines. A widely used description of mixed methods research is:
"Research in which the investigator collects and analyses data, integrates the findings, and draws inferences using both qualitative and quantitative approaches or methods in a single study or a program of inquiry.”
– Tashakkori and Cresswell, editorial in Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1: 3-7, 2007
Meet our team
The Qualitative Research Lead is supported and guided by the Melbourne Children’s Campus Qualitative Steering Committee and the Qualitative Training Working group, which comprises representatives from across campus partners.
Qualitative Research Lead
- Kate Paton
Steering committee members
- Associate Professor Belinda Dawson McClaren
- Dr Danya Vears
- Dr Fiona Lynch
- Dr Free Coulston
- Dr Trang Do
- Dr Samantha Croy
- Dr Laura Biggs
- Kate Masterson
- Bianca Devsam
Qualitative research training working group members
- Professor Lynn Gillam
- Associate Professor Belinda Dawson McClaren
- Associate Professor Sharon Lewis
- Dr Jenny O’Neill
- Dr Kelly Weir
- Imogen Boyle (RCH Education Hub)
Planning for the future: Program logic working group
- Dr Melissa Martyn
- Dr Danya Vears
- Associate Professor Belinda Dawson McClaren
- Dr Trang Do
- Dr Free Coulston
- Dr Samantha Croy
- Belle Overmars
- Kate Masterton
- Dr Laura Biggs
- Dr Roslyn LeGautier
- Bianca Devsam
Qualitative Research Community of Practice
The Qualitative Research Community of Practice (QRCoP) – formerly the Qualitative Research Interest Group (QRIG) – was formed in 2017 as a peer network to encourage and support rigorous, ethical, and methodologically sound qualitative and mixed methods research across the Melbourne Children’s Campus.
Our focus is building capacity and resources, and sharing knowledge across the Melbourne Children’s Campus partners and the wider Parkville precinct.
We support researchers by:
- Advocating for qualitative and mixed methods research approaches across the Melbourne Children’s Campus
- Fostering relationships within and between research groups
- Establishing peer-to-peer support networks
- Raising awareness of qualitative and mixed methods research through our monthly meetings
- Developing resources to support cross-campus capacity building
- Promoting consultation and collaboration across the Melbourne Children’s Campus and the wider Parkville precinct
- Contributing to broader academic discussions on methodology and capacity building internationally
Some of our current goals for 2024-2026 are:
- Understanding the role of Artificial intelligence (AI) in qualitative research
- Advocacy in the international academic community
- Supporting capacity building in low- and middle-income countries
Terms of Reference
Our Terms of Reference were established in 2017 and are continuously updated:
Monthly meetings
The Qualitative Research Community of Practice has monthly meetings on different days and times to cater to everyone's schedules. These meetings are an opportunity to connect with others keen on qualitative and mixed methods research, and to enhance skills by delving into various methodologies, analysis techniques, and relevant issues like privacy and transcription. We promote meetings through internal MCRI channels and our Community of Practice mailing list. You can sign up below.
Access meeting recordings
All meetings are recorded and distributed via the mailing list.
Sign up to receive our newsletters, updates and information about upcoming seminars and events.
Qualitative research training
Melbourne Children’s Campus training courses
A cross-campus working group, including representatives from The Royal Children’s Hospital (RCH), MCRI and the University of Melbourne Department of Paediatrics, has developed several qualitative training courses available to Melbourne Children’s Campus staff and students.
These courses are currently provided at no cost to Melbourne Children’s campus staff.
Name | Detail | Date | Time | Location |
---|---|---|---|---|
Step to Qualitative Research | Qualitative coding and analysis for beginners | Monday, October 28, 2024 |
9:00 am - 4:00 pm |
Cox and Walford meeting rooms, |
Interviewing skills | 1. Planning for qualitative interviews 2. Conducting qualitative interviews |
TBC |
1:30 pm - 5:00 pm |
TBC |
Becoming a qualitative research supervisor | Guidance for supervisors of students doing qualitative research projects | TBC | TBC | Online only |
These courses are advertised by the Qualitative Research Community of Practice mailing list, the RCH Paediatric Academy and other internal communications mechanisms. Registration is facilitated by the RCH Education Hub.
Contact [email protected] or show email address for more information about qualitative and training courses on the Melbourne Children’s Campus.
External training courses
There are several in-person and online qualitative training courses available. Please contact these organisations directly for further information.
- Introduction to Qualitative Research (Australian Consortium on Social & Political Research Inc – ACSPRI)
- Qualitative Research Methods for Public Health (Monash University)
- MELBOURNE: Qualitative Thematic Analysis MasterClass (Dr Claire Moran)
- Short Courses in Qualitative Research Methods (University of Oxford – Online)
- Qualitative Research Methods (Coursera – Online)
- Qualitative Thematic Analysis MasterClass (Dr Claire Moran – Online)
- Qualitative Research Design MasterClass (Dr Claire Moran – Online)
- Qualitative journeys (The University of Melbourne – Online)
- Powerful Qualitative Research, Simplified (Lumivero – Online)
Qualitative research resources
Developing resources to support qualitative and mixed methods researchers on the Melbourne Children’s Campus is ongoing. Please check here regularly for updates.
MCRI qualitative research guidelines
At present, we don't have a single standard protocol template for qualitative research, as various methodologies have distinct requirements. Instead, we offer regularly updated guidelines covering essential aspects of qualitative research. These guidelines adapt to changes in regulations and privacy laws.
The following guidelines and factsheets are available on the METIS Document Library.
Guidelines
Fact sheets
- Running virtual focus groups and interviews
- Dictaphones
- Web conferencing transcription
- External human transcription
- ChatGPT and Research
Reporting standards
- Allison Tong, Peter Sainsbury, Jonathan Craig, Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Volume 19, Issue 6, December 2007, Pages 349–357, doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
- O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388. PMID: 24979285.
- Huria, T., Palmer, S.C., Pitama, S. et al. Consolidated criteria for strengthening reporting of health research involving indigenous peoples: the CONSIDER statement. BMC Med Res Methodol 19, 173 (2019). doi:10.1186/s12874-019-0815-8
- Gattrell, W. T., Logullo, P., van Zuuren, E. J., Price, A., Hughes, E. L., Blazey, P., ... & Harrison, N. (2024). ACCORD (ACcurate COnsensus Reporting Document): A reporting guideline for consensus methods in biomedicine developed via a modified Delphi. PLoS Medicine, 21(1), e1004326.
Appraisal tools
- Critical Appraisal Checklists – CAPS UK
- Long HA, French DP, Brooks JM. Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences. 2020;1(1):31-42. doi:10.1177/2632084320947559
Videos available on YouTube
Past QRCoP meetings are a valuable source of information from researchers who have experience in different methodologies, methods and analysis techniques.
These additional online video resources have been recommended from within the QRCoP.
Videos on coding
- Why Do We Code?: Qualitative Research Methods (ModU: Powerful Concepts in Social Science)
- What is a Code?: Qualitative Research Methods (ModU: Powerful Concepts in Social Science)
- What Does Coding Looks Like?: Qualitative Research Methods (ModU: Powerful Concepts in Social Science)
- The Cycles of Coding: Qualitative Research Methods (ModU: Powerful Concepts in Social Science)
- How to Know You Are Coding Correctly: Qualitative Research Methods (ModU: Powerful Concepts in Social Science)
International Institute for Qualitative Methodology (IIQM) webinars
- Ten Top Tips in Qualitative Data Analysis for New Researchers (Jude Spiers)
- Introduction to Interpretive Descriptive methodology (Sally Thorne)
Publications
General texts about qualitative research
- 2020. Liamputtong. Qualitative Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- 2017. Denzin & Lincoln. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). Sage
- 2016. Creswell & Poth. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
- 2022. Madden, Raymond. Being ethnographic: a guide to the theory and practice of ethnography. (3rd ed.) Third. ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
- 2014. Charmaz, Kathy. Constructing grounded theory. (2nd ed. ed) Introducing qualitative methods. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
General texts about mixed methods research
- 2014. Creswell, J. Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. USA: Sage Publications Inc.
- 2018. Creswell, J. & Plano Clark V. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd Ed. USA: Sage Publications.
Data analysis
- 2013. Grbich, Carol. Qualitative data analysis: an introduction. 2nd ed. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications.
Coding
- 2021. Saldana. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. 4th Edition. Sage Publications.
Content analysis
- 2022. Vears, Gillam. Inductive content analysis. A guide for beginning qualitative researchers
- 2022. Vears, Gillam. Inductive content analysis
- 2008. Elo, Kyngas, The qualitative content analysis process.
- 2005. Hsieh, Shannon. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.
Thematic analysis
- 2021. Clarke, Braun. Thematic Analysis: a practical guide. Sage.
- 2021. Braun, Clarke. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
- 2019. Braun, Clarke. Reflecting on thematic analysis
- Clarke, Thematic analysis website resources
- Clarke, Thematic analysis lectures
- 2011. Smith, Firth. Qualitative data analysis. The Framework approach.
Quality
- 2017. Kalu, Bwalya. What makes qualitative research good research. An exploratory analysis of critical elements.
- 2018. Sanders, Sim, Kingstone. Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualisation and operationalisation.
- 2019. Braun, Clarke. To saturate or not to saturate. Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales
- 2023. D'Aprano, Lloyd-Johnsen. Trusting relationships and learning together: A rapid review of Indigenous reference groups in Australian Indigenous health research. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 47(3), p.100051.
Sampling
- 2010. Mason, M. Sample Size and Saturation in PhD Studies Using Qualitative Interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3).
- 2013. O’Reilly, M., & Parker, N. ‘Unsatisfactory Saturation’: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 13(2), 190–197.
- 2014. Robinson, OC. Sampling in Interview-Based Qualitative Research: A Theoretical and Practical Guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25–41.
- 2018. Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: Systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 148.
- 2022. Hennink, M, & Kaiser, BN. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, 114523.
Mixed methods
- 2007. Tashakkori & Cresswell, editorial in Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1: 3-7,
- 2013. Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156.
- 2015a. Fetters, M. D., & Freshwater, D. The 1 + 1 = 3 Integration Challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 115–117.
- 2015b. Fetters, M., & Freshwater, D. Publishing a Methodological Mixed Methods Research Article. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(3), 203–213.
- 2018. Hong et al. Mixed methods Appraisal Tool. Education for Information, 34 (4) pp285-291
Delphi studies
- 2020. McClaren, B., King, E., Crellin, E., Gaff, C., Metcalfe, S., Nisselle, A., Development of an Evidence-Based, Theory-Informed National Survey of Physician Preparedness for Genomic Medicine and Preferences for Genomics Continuing Education
- 2022. King E, Halliday J, Archibald AD, Delatycki M, Barlow-Stewart K, Newson AJ, McClaren BJ. Development and use of the Australian reproductive genetic carrier screening decision aid. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022 Feb;30(2):194-202. doi: 10.1038/s41431-021-00991-x. Epub 2021 Nov 1. PMID: 34725472; PMCID: PMC8821595.
- Nasa P, Jain R, Juneja D. Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness. World J Methodol. 2021 Jul 20;11(4):116-129. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116. PMID: 34322364; PMCID: PMC8299905.